In the second part of this three-part series, we investigate what strategies and processes can be implemented following contract award to minimise the effects of disruption and ensure its effects can be properly captured.
A successful megaproject was delivered by the head contractor to the NSW government and was declared as being on-time and on-budget.
But was it a success for the subcontractors?
Weather Delays: In Anticipation of Precipitation
What is a Cumulative Impact Claim?
Christmas is a time to be merry. But amidst the festive cheer, it’s crucial to remain vigilant and address potential risks that may arise during the holiday period.
In construction—disruption is inevitable. In the first part of this three-part series, we dive into what strategies can be implemented in the pre-contract phase to minimise the effects of disruption.
Calibrate adopted a bespoke forensic delay analysis to assess the validity of the contractor’s EOT claims and provided an independent expert report to support the dispute resolution process.
Calibrate was engaged to provide critical support to a distressed apartment project, assisting the build process to regain its momentum in order to meet completion.
Calibrate prepared submissions and supporting evidence in support of delay, disruption and variation claims with a successful outcome in adjudication.
What are the potential consequences of a superintendent failing to act impartially, and has the door opened for constructive acceleration claims?
To ‘But For or Not But For’?
Calibrate prepared submissions and evidence in support of over $50m in claims with a successful outcome in adjudication.
An Approach to the Recovery of Escalation Costs
Calibrate was engaged by a Main Contractor to prepare a strategy concerning timely project completion, reducing exposure to liquidated damages under the head contract, and recovering proper entitlements to EOT and delay costs.
Calibrate was engaged to undertake an independent review of a significant disputed prolongation claim.
Essential reading for commercial managers, contract managers and superintendents – a recent Queensland Court of Appeal decision that clarifies several common issues in contract administration and claims.
Calibrate was heavily involved in the development of the project commercial and dispute resolution strategy for a distressed project in Auckland, New Zealand.
Calibrate was engaged by a Main Contractor to prepare a strategy concerning timely project completion, reducing exposure to liquidated damages under the head contract, and recovering proper entitlements to EOT and delay costs.
Calibrate was engaged by a major infrastructure subcontractor to prepare disruption claims for the recovery of increased labour costs that arose on two Sydney Metro projects due to losses in trade labour productivity.
How to Identify Disruption and Claim Additional Costs
The Contractor capitalised on Calibrate’s extensive SOPA claim experience to guide the dispute resolution timeline, strategy and to then prepare the adjudication submission.
Calibrate was engaged by a major subcontractor to assess the effects and impacts of various disruptive events on trade labour productivity across the project.
Calibrate was engaged by a Head Contractor to provide commercial advisory services on a high-risk project under onerous contract conditions.
Calibrate was engaged by a major civil subcontractor to assess the impacts of COVID-19 relating to project delay and disruption to labour productivity.
Calibrate was engaged to identify and prepare claims on a complex Federal Government project for a major Defence services subcontractor.